Let Us Pity the Poor Rapist

crusader-rapistVia Hoyden About Town comes the story of New Zealand rugby player Jake Paringatai, who committed an act of sexual violence against a woman in at a social function.  Of course, as seems to always happen when a perpetrator is a famous sports star, rape apologism from both the media and the courts has ensued, complete with boo-hooing about how the man’s career has been ruined over one silly little incident!

Exhibit A is the headline Former Crusader fined over grope, followed by this opening to the story:

Former Crusaders No 8 Jake Paringatai today saw the price he has paid for a clumsy drunken grope of a woman at a social function – $12,500 and most of his rugby career.

The price he has paid for a clumsy, drunken grope?  You can hear the remorse for what that horrible woman did to this poor man, who made one teeny, tiny error, just dripping off the page.  This would be bad enough on it’s own, of course.  But it gets a whole lot worse once you realize that Paringatai did much more than “grope” his victim:

Paringatai, who is now living in Australia, grabbed the bottom of a woman he did not know at a social function in Christchurch in May 2007.

The 22-year-old woman felt a finger penetrate her vagina through two layers of clothing and Judge Neave described it as “humiliating and devastating ordeal”.

Yeah, here’s a clue.  Forcibly penetrating a woman without her consent, even if you don’t use your penis, is rape.  Period.  It’s rape.

But that, of course, has not stopped all of the sniffling on his behalf:

His name suppression lapsed at his sentencing by Judge Raoul Neave in Christchurch District Court today when Paringatai did not ask for it to be continued, the Christchurch Court News website reported.

Instead, he can now expect a great deal of attention with his name made public at the end of a case the media have been following under suppression orders for nearly two years.

During that time, the media were not even allowed to describe him as a professional sportsman.

“The publicity will be much greater in your case and the damage to your reputation, if not irreparable, will be significant,” Judge Neave said.

“The vultures are already circling over the carcass as I speak.”

Oh noes!  Us vultures, when confronted with a rapist, call him a rapist!  Indeed, what horrible people we are.  I don’t know how we live with ourselves, dragging this clearly good and decent man through the mud.

After all, he didn’t mean it.

Defence counsel Jonathan Eaton said it turned out that a drunken, impulsive act that lasted a couple of seconds had caused harm and had lasting consequences for all those involved.

It had brought shame for Paringatai and his family, teammates, coaches, and the sport which had occupied him fulltime since he was 19 years-old.

He had written letters of apology, and Mr Eaton expressed those sentiments in court.

Paringatai had unquestionably permanently lost the opportunity to represent New Zealand at rugby, Mr Eaton said.

He had been forced to ply his trade overseas – he has been playing in Ireland and in Japan – and there were serious questionmarks over whether his career could now survive his guilty plea and conviction.

Come on, folks!  This was drunken and impulsive!  No worse than putting a lampshade on your head and dancing around the house like a moron!  Well okay, maybe a little bit worse, but can’t we all agree that this man has suffered enough?  After all, he said he was sorry, the people he knows have been very upset to learn what kind of guy they’ve been hanging out with, and now he has to go to such godforsaken lands as Japan!  And Ireland!

Obviously, all of that is much more powerful than the impact on the woman that Paringatai raped, who described herself as wondering what she did to deserve this, having lost weight and self-esteem, facing difficulty finding work shortly after the assault and still experiencing “intimacy problems.”

But amazingly, the worst apologism does not come from the defense attorney.  It comes from the judge:

Judge Neave referred to Paringatai possibly believing at the time that his status as a professional rugby player gave him a greater entitlement to respect.

There was hypocrisy in the community being happy that these young men were paid large sums of money, and consistently telling them they were wonderful.

It was hardly surprising if Paringatai ended up with an inflated idea of his own importance.

He accepted that Paringatai had never intended his actions to be as intrusive as they were.

He noted that afterwards, Paringatai had been asked whether offence-related sexual issues needed to be considered.

He replied: “Nah. I was just being a meat-head.”

Yes, don’t you hate it when you accidentally rape someone?  You didn’t realize that raping her was going to be intrusive!  How could you know?  It’s like, you’re messing around and, oops, all of a sudden — rape!

Oh wait, what’s not how rape happens at all?  Rape is designed to be intrusive and even if you didn’t “intend” to be intrusive, you really should have thought about that before committing the rape in the first place?

Someone ought to tell it to the judge.

On a further note, since when is it customary to use the “what do you think your punishment should be?” style of parenting in a courtroom?   And since when did one using that style of parenting just shrug their shoulders and say “okay” when the the offender says “I think you should punish me by expecting that I’ll try harder next time”?

Really, everything about this is disgusting.  Because, in closing, the judge justified his decision to merely fine Paringatai with the fact that big old meanies like me were going to just tear him down.

Judge Neave fined Paringatai $2500 but stopped short of imposing a supervision sentence, because he now lived in Australia. The crown had sought a community work sentence.

The judge said he took into account Paringatai’s remorse, the effect his actions had already had on his career, the reparation payment he had made voluntarily, and the publicity he could now expect.

Maybe we’re giving this publicity to the case because someone needs to take the actions seriously.  Someone needs to take this rape seriously, and this woman’s trauma seriously.  And it’s obviously not going to be the government.

0 thoughts on “Let Us Pity the Poor Rapist

  1. Alexa

    I wonder if someone had “accidentally” penetrated the judge’s asshole like that if he’d still think of it so lightly? Somehow, I’m guessing not.

    Plenty of assholishness to go around in that situation.

    Reply
  2. Bettyboodnoggle

    “I wonder if someone had “accidentally” penetrated the judge’s asshole like that if he’d still think of it so lightly? Somehow, I’m guessing not.”

    Well, of course not! He’s a man! He has rights! That chick probably wanted it anyway. I mean, she was THERE and is FEMALE, amiright?

    Reply
  3. karak

    To penetrate someone through two layers of clothes (I’m assuming underwear and pants) is no easy task– that would hurt like hell and would require a great deal of force on his part. As bullshit as the “drunken grope” argument is, this clearly doesn’t even fall under that category.

    How hard is it NOT to shave your fingers into someone’s vagina? I mean, you manage not to grab anyone’s balls. Surely, it can’t be that hard.

    Reply
  4. SunlessNick

    From the news story:

    In negotiations before the sentencing, Paringatai had agreed to make a voluntary emotional harm reparation payment of $10,000 to the woman.

    Judge Neave said he wanted to make it quite clear this was a way of showing his remorse and because of his concern for her.

    Isn’t it interesting how his concern is so great just before his punishment is decided, but not when deciding whether to commit the crime. But I guess noticing stuff like that is just some of the mean-spiritedness that the judge warned this poor man might face.

    Reply
  5. Amanda

    In NZ we are terrible at actually handing out appropriate sentences. Most assault cases end in community service and/or a fine. Recently a police officer was arrested for assaulting his wife. He received 400 hours community service, which I can assure you is a piece of cake. Another recent case was a family who abused their young two year old daughter until she eventually died from her injuries. This included her being placed in a drycleaner and it turned on, hung on the clothesline and swung around, wrestling moves used on her and being kicked across the room.

    The family members that did those horrible things received life sentences with a non-parole sentence of 15 years. Parole which they are very likely to get.

    We have a shameful history of victim-blaming and poor sentencing. And with our current government, I can’t imagine it changing any time soon.

    Reply
  6. Pingback: Being Amber Rhea » Blog Archive » links for 2009-02-28

  7. Aspasia

    *boggles*

    Just…wow. Okay, exactly through which layer of clothing would the judge have deemed it too intrusive? Three? Four? Snowsuit thickness? What, dude, what?

    Reply
  8. akeeyu

    Speaking of pitying the poor rapist…

    There’s a guy up here who raped two women and got 20 years (yay), which I suspect has to with the fact that he is a POC (boo), but either way, he is now begging to be executed. Why? Because he’s afraid of getting raped in prison and said “I prefer death a thousand times over being raped.”

    Well…um…look, dude, I really can’t help you, there. The irony has rusted over and rendered me completely immobile.

    And furthermore: “I want to pay for the act of cowardice,” he added. “I admit it, but I just don’t want to be raped.”

    Not that I’m advocating prison rape, here, but come ON, Mr. Rapist. You don’t see a connection at all? Not even a little bit? Not even a teensy bit of self reflection and abject groveling to your victims about how you forced them to endure something a thousand times worse than death? No? It’s all whining about you and your feelings?

    Welcome to douchebag. Population: You.

    Reply
    1. Cara Post author

      Akeeyu — yeah, I really do believe in the adage (was it Ghandi who said it, I think?) that an eye for an eye will leave us all blind. So I hardly subscribe to that kind of theory of “justice,” and I think that prison rape is a monumental problem that needs to be eradicated, like, NOW and that no one, not even the worst murderers, should have to endure rape as a part of their punishment for their crimes.

      But that being said? Yeah, that is seriously fucked up.

      Reply
  9. Anon Ymous

    Karak: I wasn’t even thinking of the force required when I was thinking how f*cked up the excuse of a*se-grabbing was… no idea why.

    What struck me as fishy was, in my experience (a couple of occasions) of getting my a*se grabbed by drunken idiots, who were too drunk to realise they would cause offence with it and apologised immediately when I made it clear I didn’t like it (I’m a big lass [6’1], and usually the sober one at pubs etc, and drunken apologies are pretty funny, really)… well, even really drunk guys know where the basic anatomy is. A guy who thinks grabbing an a*se-cheek is funny and doesn’t mean to penetrate – doesn’t penetrate. His fingers don’t go anywhere near there. It’s a fair way around, and I reckon you have to be aiming for it to rape a person like that.

    And no, I don’t like the fact that grabbing a girl’s a*se is seen as just playing and not real assault, but that’s the way it is, and that’s what this trial is playing on. His defence is playing on the fact that if he was only horsing around then he’s just a regular bloke who made a mistake (and is real sorry for it. Honest).

    But the story doesn’t wash. As Karak noted, he must have used a *lot* of force, and I reckon he must have known he was reaching around towards the front side. There’s no way this was regular sh*ts and giggles – normal piggery doesn’t “accidentally” make an a*sehole into a rapist.

    It just doesn’t happen.

    Reply
  10. Renee

    This story is absolutely appalling. I am particularly upset that he is being allowed to purchase his way out of punishment. I don’t care how much money this man makes, what he did to the victim is inexcusable. She will have to live with the consequences of his actions for the rest of her life and no amount of money can wash away the pain. He was purposeful in his actions. The whole drunken buffoonery is nothing more than a cover for his sense of entitlement. This kind of thing is going to continue to happen until we decide that it is unacceptable to rape women.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s